Home DR. VIBE SHOW™ PODCASTS The Dr. Vibe Show™: Dr. Vibe’s Real Talk With Real Women “Are...

The Dr. Vibe Show™: Dr. Vibe’s Real Talk With Real Women “Are Women Committed To Commitment?”

886
1
Kenya Williams
Kenya Williams
Raegan Mathis
Brandy Williams
Brandy Williams
Aleasa Word
Aleasa Word

During this edition of “Dr. Vibe’s Real Talk With Real Women”, Kenya Williams, Raegan Mathis, Brandy Williams and Aleasa Word

During their conversation, they discuss:

– Are some women over committed to commitment?
– When it comes to relationships, are women more commitment oriented today than ten years ago?
– The issue of “settling” in a relationship
– Where did they get their examples of positive commitment in relationshps?
– Why are more women become less commitment oriented?
– Why are many mothers not teaching about commitment to their daughters?
– Are women still committed to family?
– How much effect has the media had on womens commitment to relationships?

Please feel free to email us at info@blackcanadianman.com

Please feel free to “Like” the “The Dr. Vibe Show” Facebook fan page at “The Dr. Vibe Show” Facebook Fan Page

God bless, peace, be well and keep the faith,
Dr. Vibe
info@blackcanadianman.com
2012 Black Weblog Awards Winner (Best International Blog)
2012 Black Weblog Awards Finalist (Best Podcast)
2011 Black Weblog Awards Finalist (Best International Blog and Best Podcast Series)
Black Blog Of The Day – Black Bloggers Network – June 23, 2011
Twitter
Twitter hashtag: #DrVibe
The Dr. Vibe Show – iTunes
The Dr. Vibe Show At “The Good Men Project”
Dr. Vibe Media – You Tube
Google+
The Dr. Vibe Show – Stitcher Radio
“The Dr. Vibe Show” Facebook Fan Page

1 COMMENT

  1. Wondsrful write-up, particularly the modularization of views.
    Imagined I’d share my similar experience. I started with the exact same use of long/multipart
    class names, and although it is performant, I found it a bit cumbersome to develop with.
    In my approach, I strictly adhhered to representing each levl of structyure from the class identify, so a link from the headline would haave the class identify
    .apple_headline_link’. This produced nesting or un-nesting elements require a
    great deal of tedious class renaming, making rapjd experimentation quite burdensome.Instead, I switched too a convention that rellies on the child combinator.E.g.,.apple /* rules */
    .apple > .-headline /* rules */ .apple >.-headline > .-link
    /* rules */ .apple > .-subHead /* rules */ .apple > .-subHead > .-link /* rules, can differ from
    header liink */ .apple > .-body /* rules */ (Sodry about the formatting, can’t seem to improve it.) The benefit of this cokes
    when using a CSS preprocessor. I use Stylus, since I usee node.js for
    construct tooling..apple // rules > .-headline // rules > .-link // rules > .-subHead // ruless > .-link // rules > .-body // ruules &._green background-color
    green Now moving elements arouund only requires adding/removing
    a selector and indenting/un-indenting a bunch of declaration blocks.
    Performance is nevertheless excellent, but theoretically not as ery good as singlle class selectors.A necessary elemet of this approach iis that sub-elements have class
    names starting with a dash, while root elements do not.By
    corollary, all class names starting with a dash are only used inn
    selector groups scoped to a root class. With this convention, sub-elements are like private variables in OOP, with no meaning inn the global class
    namespace. I also use “flags” (e.g. “_green”, usiing an underscore prefix naming convention), whijch are analagous
    to a public boolean property inside the OO planet.
    Consumers are free to “set” aany supported flag on the module’s root element.Anyway, thanks again ffor the wondedful read through.

Comments are closed.